Queer

[videnovasan]

Another good one for him
https://www.ft.com/content/f22811ee-ac4 ... 6864425cc5

[Germangirl]

You have to subscribe. You have the Text? Could you perhaps Post it?

[videnovasan]

You have to subscribe. You have the Text? Could you perhaps Post it?

Et voila

Daniel Craig puts Bond behind him in Luca Guadagnino’s Queer — review

The trippy adaptation of a William S Burroughs novel brings out Craig’s best-ever performance

How does an actor shake off the burdensome mantle of Bond? One way is to move to Mexico, adopt a diet of hard liquor and hard drugs, and vigorously perform fellatio on screen. This is the approach adopted by Daniel Craig in Luca Guadagnino’s Queer, a colourful and suitably trippy adaptation of William S Burroughs’ follow-up of sorts to the better-known Junkie.

If homoerotic tension bubbled under the surface of Guadagnino’s Challengers earlier this year, here it is boiling urgently from the beginning. William Lee (Craig) is a permanently sweaty and predatory fiftyish man constantly making eyes at and advances on younger men among a community of American expats. He reeks of desperation and booze, his sibilant diction sometimes bringing to mind Kevin Spacey. But with his quick wit and silver tongue, he frequently scores. It may be the 1940s, but here in Mexico City nobody bothers to keep their predilections private. Portly bar-owner Frank (a delightful Jason Schwartzman) doesn’t mind having “El puto gringo” scrawled on his wall because “it pays to advertise”.

Guadagnino adopts a style that mixes the seedy with suave stylings of classic Hollywood. The period costumes are on point, smoke curls elegantly from cigarettes and Justin Kuritzkes’ script crackles with snappy, urbane dialogue.

But there are less congruent touches too. The eclectic and evocative soundtrack ranges from New Order to frequent use of Nirvana, an obscure B-side burbling anachronistically from a 1940s jukebox. There are also visual hints of more metaphysical elements to come. At one point, lost in reverie, Lee’s face dissolves into jittering scan lines of TV interference. At another, he extends a phantom hand to caress an elusive crush.

He is the standoffish Eugene (Drew Starkey), who even Lee can’t confirm as gay, let alone seduce — and thus finds irresistible. The younger man is compared to baked Alaska — hot on the outside, cold on the inside, growing ever chillier the stronger Lee comes on with offers of a trip to the Amazon. “What have you got to lose?” Lee presses. The cool answer: “Independence.”

In time, Lee will be faced with the withdrawal of both affection and heroin, both of which serve to suppress his demons. For all his unabashed appetites, he still carries the baggage of intense self-loathing. “Could it be that I was one of those subhuman things?” he recalls wondering about his dawning sexuality.

This complex churn of emotions demands much from Craig, and he proves equal to the task. It is a pleasure to see him so loosey-goosey after his tightly controlled 15-year turn as 007 and he gives possibly his finest performance to date. Which makes it all the more dismaying that the film becomes wayward in its final act as Lee embarks on a quixotic mission to find the mysterious drug yajé, better known to 21st-century self-discoverers as ayahuasca.

By the time Lesley Manville turns up as a kooky jungle botanist, offering hospitality at gunpoint and under the watchful gaze of a sloth, the mood has lurched towards the cartoonish. Unsurprisingly, the introduction of mind-altering substances does nothing to quell this. “Yajé is a mirror,” she advises. “You may not like what you see.” Indeed not.

If you’ve ever sat through someone’s account of an ayahuasca session, you know what to expect. But any drug experience must come with a comedown and it’s not enough to undo the highs of everything that has gone before — a frantic rush of hedonism suffused with a beautiful melancholy.

★★★★☆

Festival continues to September 7, labiennale.org

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2024. All rights reserved.Reuse this content(opens in new window)CommentsJump to comments section
Explore the series
READ MOREVenice Film Festival 2024: what to see
Tilda Swinton and Julianne Moore debate love and death in Pedro Almodóvar’s The Room Next Door — review

Currently reading:
Daniel Craig puts Bond behind him in Luca Guadagnino’s Queer — review
Tilda Swinton and Julianne Moore debate love and death in Pedro Almodóvar’s The Room Next Door — review
Five stars for The Brutalist — postwar epic of architecture and survival with Adrien Brody
Nicole Kidman jump-starts the erotic thriller in Babygirl — review
Angelina Jolie makes a glamorous Callas in Pablo Larraín’s Maria — review
Disclaimer review — Cate Blanchett has a dark secret in frothy but moreish miniseries
Follow the topics in this article
Film
Add to myFT
Venice Film Festival
Add to myFT
Jason Schwartzman
Add to myFT
Daniel Craig
Add to myFT
William Burroughs
Add to myFT
Comments
Useful links
Support
Legal & Privacy
Services
Tools
Community & Events
More from the FT Group
Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2024. FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.

[videnovasan]

You have to subscribe. You have the Text? Could you perhaps Post it?

Et voila

Daniel Craig puts Bond behind him in Luca Guadagnino’s Queer — review

The trippy adaptation of a William S Burroughs novel brings out Craig’s best-ever performance

How does an actor shake off the burdensome mantle of Bond? One way is to move to Mexico, adopt a diet of hard liquor and hard drugs, and vigorously perform fellatio on screen. This is the approach adopted by Daniel Craig in Luca Guadagnino’s Queer, a colourful and suitably trippy adaptation of William S Burroughs’ follow-up of sorts to the better-known Junkie.

If homoerotic tension bubbled under the surface of Guadagnino’s Challengers earlier this year, here it is boiling urgently from the beginning. William Lee (Craig) is a permanently sweaty and predatory fiftyish man constantly making eyes at and advances on younger men among a community of American expats. He reeks of desperation and booze, his sibilant diction sometimes bringing to mind Kevin Spacey. But with his quick wit and silver tongue, he frequently scores. It may be the 1940s, but here in Mexico City nobody bothers to keep their predilections private. Portly bar-owner Frank (a delightful Jason Schwartzman) doesn’t mind having “El puto gringo” scrawled on his wall because “it pays to advertise”.

Guadagnino adopts a style that mixes the seedy with suave stylings of classic Hollywood. The period costumes are on point, smoke curls elegantly from cigarettes and Justin Kuritzkes’ script crackles with snappy, urbane dialogue.

But there are less congruent touches too. The eclectic and evocative soundtrack ranges from New Order to frequent use of Nirvana, an obscure B-side burbling anachronistically from a 1940s jukebox. There are also visual hints of more metaphysical elements to come. At one point, lost in reverie, Lee’s face dissolves into jittering scan lines of TV interference. At another, he extends a phantom hand to caress an elusive crush.

He is the standoffish Eugene (Drew Starkey), who even Lee can’t confirm as gay, let alone seduce — and thus finds irresistible. The younger man is compared to baked Alaska — hot on the outside, cold on the inside, growing ever chillier the stronger Lee comes on with offers of a trip to the Amazon. “What have you got to lose?” Lee presses. The cool answer: “Independence.”

In time, Lee will be faced with the withdrawal of both affection and heroin, both of which serve to suppress his demons. For all his unabashed appetites, he still carries the baggage of intense self-loathing. “Could it be that I was one of those subhuman things?” he recalls wondering about his dawning sexuality.

This complex churn of emotions demands much from Craig, and he proves equal to the task. It is a pleasure to see him so loosey-goosey after his tightly controlled 15-year turn as 007 and he gives possibly his finest performance to date. Which makes it all the more dismaying that the film becomes wayward in its final act as Lee embarks on a quixotic mission to find the mysterious drug yajé, better known to 21st-century self-discoverers as ayahuasca.

By the time Lesley Manville turns up as a kooky jungle botanist, offering hospitality at gunpoint and under the watchful gaze of a sloth, the mood has lurched towards the cartoonish. Unsurprisingly, the introduction of mind-altering substances does nothing to quell this. “Yajé is a mirror,” she advises. “You may not like what you see.” Indeed not.

If you’ve ever sat through someone’s account of an ayahuasca session, you know what to expect. But any drug experience must come with a comedown and it’s not enough to undo the highs of everything that has gone before — a frantic rush of hedonism suffused with a beautiful melancholy.

★★★★☆

Festival continues to September 7, labiennale.org

[Germangirl]

Thanks. Lots of the reviews Sound very good. Guess its either love or hate

[Germangirl]

Its Back to 80% after having been down to 75. I Hope, its gonna keep an 8 up front

[videnovasan]

Thanks. Lots of the reviews Sound very good. Guess its either love or hate

For the movie is love or hate, but for his performance is always love, from what I've read.

[Germangirl]

Yes

[Vanquish]

[videnovasan]

A good one....originally in Italian, but Google translates it pretty well....
https://www.moviestruckers.it/recension ... iel-craig/

[Germangirl]

Its down to 77% again. 30 reviews. Seems its a bit unsettled and Not even in some parts. A pity. Otherwise IT might well be a Sure Oscar nod. WE will See

[videnovasan]

Its down to 77% again. 30 reviews. Seems its a bit unsettled and Not even in some parts. A pity. Otherwise IT might well be a Sure Oscar nod. WE will See

I'm reading the book now.... It is not everybody's cup of tea as well. From what I've read about the plot of the movie and what I'm reading in the book it is similar.....and the book is inconsistent as well, so probably that is the truthness to Burroughs....it was obvious it will polarise the critics and the audiences....

[Germangirl]

Yes surely. Sometimes they get nods even if the movie seems Not Oscar worthy. So He still hast a chance

[videnovasan]

So a french guy won the best actor in Venice just now......it is a struggle to memorise french names....

[Germangirl]

So, they got away literally with nothing. I dont think, they expected that.