Logan Lucky

SilverDragon · Post by **SilverDragon** » Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:41 pm

Germangirl wrote:Channing does look odd with the beard. I mean, odder then Daniel with the hair

Your right!

SmittenDramaKitten · Post by **SmittenDramaKitten** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 2:23 pm

Imo, Channing looks better with a beard coz it covers most of his face!!!

CT is not a man I find attractive nor do I understand other people's attraction to him.

Daniel? Hot as ever.

bumblebee · Post by **bumblebee** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:24 pm

SmittenDramaKitten wrote:Imo, Channing looks better with a beard coz it covers most of his face!!! CT is not a man I find attractive nor do I understand other people's attraction to him. Daniel? Hot as ever.

Channing is yuck. Small features, one big pudge ball face, monotone skin.

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 5:23 am

Something in his face is off. If you have a longer look, nothing fits.

sf2la · Post by **sf2la** » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:07 pm

bumblebee wrote:I think I'll just stick with the Spectre thread. This film looks like poop. Why DC, why?

Bee, you crack me up. I agree with regarding the looks. Hate the hair length and color. No words to describe the hatred of the tats (he has enough of his own already, please.) But it's different from Bond, and I think that attracted him. But dang, there are so many good roles for men out there. I hope this isn't a 'Smokey and the Bandid' or stupid guy's movie.

I'm just enjoying seeing him after this dry spell. Does anyone else think that Adam Driver is particularly unattractive??? I really like his character in Girls, but dang, he's turning into a big movie star. I don't get it. I do give credit to Channing Tatum for crouching down in every photo because i think he's doing it out of respect for DC for trying not to appear that much larger, which he is.

I just look at Daniel's torso and imagine him without the fake tats. That makes me happy.

tbossmc2000 · Post by **tbossmc2000** » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:35 pm

How funny is this, a Brit playing a nascar beer drinking red neckðŸ˜œðŸ˜œðŸ˜œ
Crackers me up. Has he trashed his front yard with broken down cars an trash.
I wonder if they play you know your a redneck when: (fill in the blank)
You all have to check out Jeff foxworthy and Larry the cable guy.
SF, those are prison tats. Or supposed to be. Ja Ja Ja
He's having fun with a bunch of guys.
Mummmm his body is so nice.

This post is my humor,

SmittenDramaKitten · Post by **SmittenDramaKitten** » Mon Oct 03, 2016 6:01 pm

I was having doubts about this movie too...
I am just hoping that Soderburgh can turn it into something witty and slick and not a 'dumb guys movie' as Sf so cleverly puts it...

Daniel needs to get rid of the tats that aren't his and get his hair back to his natural colour. He could carry the bleached blonde look in SV much easier because the look was shaggy/textured and Ray was adorable anyway... Regardless of this current look, he still loots hot.

Sylvia's girl · Post by **Sylvia's girl** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:47 am

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:26 am

This is really fast. I am not worried about a woman writing it. Maybe its even better, as she might want to avoid too much clichÃ©.

Sylvia's girl · Post by **Sylvia's girl** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:21 am

Germangirl wrote:This is really fast. I am not worried about a woman writing it. Maybe its even better, as she might want to avoid too much clichÃ©.

He's renowned for working quickly, but he's got a whole year for cutting and editing.
The complete opposite of a Bond movie.

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:39 am

True. A much better way IMO. You can screw up badly with wrong editing.

Maria · Post by **Maria** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:19 pm

The editing was one thing that bothered me with Quantum of Solace - too fast cutting from one close up to another. I so wanted to say to the cinema screen "Press pause and go slow!"

Germangirl · Post by **Germangirl** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:40 pm

Had they not done that, we would have had a much better film.

Maria · Post by **Maria** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:07 pm

Germangirl wrote:Had they not done that, we would have had a much better film.

Was that the latest" trend" at the time? Fast cutting an action scene because they had some sort of camera or the technical ability to do so, but it did not help the film in any way. (Although personally, that was the weakest of DC's Bond films a a whole.) I think the third Jason Bourne film also did this editing, and it was a mess.

SmittenDramaKitten · Post by **SmittenDramaKitten** » Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:54 pm

David Fincher famously bad-mouths Soderburgh on a bonus feature on the GDT BR for wrapping shooting on a movie in under 50 days when, some months later, he's still at it. "These fucking people!" He laughs. DF is such a perfectionist and shoots the same scene 30 different ways. Each director has his own process though.

SG posted a link to an interview with Marc Foster about QOS lately. I wish I'd commented at the time but MF basically said the movie is gaining some kind of cult status now. I absolutely agree with him. OK, QOS is my FOURTH favourite of Daniels Bonds but I still enjoy watching it. The editing bugged me for ages to begin with but I've got used to it now. I think Daniels Bonds are like pizza: Even when they're bad they're still pretty good.