Betrayal - pics and vids
Moderator: Germangirl
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47073
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
ou mean the smiling pic in the blue shirt? Its like that, when you are front row. That makes it so NICE!bumblebee wrote:Holy F**k, SF - you got that close!!!!
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
- CockHargreaves
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:20 pm
- Location: UK
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47073
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
- PAMELA BRAMMER
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:30 pm
- Location: Northern England
betrayl - pics and vids
Thanks for the pics sf. They are brillant. I would be very happy if I got pics like these.
I know what you mean about his hair. At the stage door for ASR I just wanted to reach out and touch it.
I know what you mean about his hair. At the stage door for ASR I just wanted to reach out and touch it.
Never regret anything that makes you smile!
Thank to everyone for posting pics.
Sf, after two visits to NY to see Betrayal you have obviously become quite blasé about seeing and photographing Daniel. Thanks for the great pics and I can’t believe you had reservations about posting them. I reckon for one of them you must have stuck the camera/ phone in his face!
Sf, after two visits to NY to see Betrayal you have obviously become quite blasé about seeing and photographing Daniel. Thanks for the great pics and I can’t believe you had reservations about posting them. I reckon for one of them you must have stuck the camera/ phone in his face!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47073
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
I know, you don't mean it like that, but sf is a bit like Daniel in that perspective - she is always shy about her own acclomplishments.cassandra wrote:Thank to everyone for posting pics.
Sf, after two visits to NY to see Betrayal you have obviously become quite blasé about seeing and photographing Daniel. Thanks for the great pics and I can’t believe you had reservations about posting them. I reckon for one of them you must have stuck the camera/ phone in his face!
The top notch acting in the Weisz/Craig/Spall 'Betrayal' is emotionally true, often v funny and its beautifully staged with filmic qualities..
GG is right. It's not that I'm blasé. Not in the least. I have the hots for DC as much as Rachel does! It's just that I used to be really into photography. I had a darkroom in high school (way back.). For years and years I had the top professional equipment, (medium format Hasselblad, top-of-the line DLSR with all the lenses for both, strobes, you name it - in fact I still have the equipment). I belonged to professional phogographers associations and went to all the meetings, conventions in Vegas, etc. But then, I got tired of lugging around equipment. I found that a good compact camera that lets you have some control over the settings was much more pleasurable to use and I took the easy and lighter route. So now I have a nice little camera, the Leica D-Lux 6, that if used properly, produces amazing results. It has a 1.4 aperture if anyone knows what that means.
I looked at those two close-ups above and saw blurred images (I didn't expect him to get that close in front of me or I would have set my lens to macro mode which would have put him in focus) and i cut off his head It's a good thing my hands were occupied! Lol. But the chopped off head shot does show his light chest hairs, which I, too, find incredibly sexy. He doesn't have enough to be a rug, but the little he has just oozes more (if possible) testosterone.
So I'm stuck in this hypercritical situation of the photos I take. If they are blurred, if the lighting is off, etc., I've always tossed them to the side. I don't like to show the bad stuff. But after reading your posts, to hell with my technical hang ups when it comes to Daniel. I'm happy if they make anyone here happy. I need to get over my perfectionism. I'm very hard on myself.
And yes, Bee, he was standing just a foot in front of me and talking. Pretty surreal. It doesn't last long though. I'll have to see about Saturday. You now have me motivated. .
I looked at those two close-ups above and saw blurred images (I didn't expect him to get that close in front of me or I would have set my lens to macro mode which would have put him in focus) and i cut off his head It's a good thing my hands were occupied! Lol. But the chopped off head shot does show his light chest hairs, which I, too, find incredibly sexy. He doesn't have enough to be a rug, but the little he has just oozes more (if possible) testosterone.
So I'm stuck in this hypercritical situation of the photos I take. If they are blurred, if the lighting is off, etc., I've always tossed them to the side. I don't like to show the bad stuff. But after reading your posts, to hell with my technical hang ups when it comes to Daniel. I'm happy if they make anyone here happy. I need to get over my perfectionism. I'm very hard on myself.
And yes, Bee, he was standing just a foot in front of me and talking. Pretty surreal. It doesn't last long though. I'll have to see about Saturday. You now have me motivated. .
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 47073
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:05 pm
- Location: Germany
sf2la wrote:GG is right. It's not that I'm blasé. Not in the least. I have the hots for DC as much as Rachel does! It's just that I used to be really into photography. I had a darkroom in high school (way back.). For years and years I had the top professional equipment, (medium format Hasselblad, top-of-the line DLSR with all the lenses for both, strobes, you name it - in fact I still have the equipment). I belonged to professional phogographers associations and went to all the meetings, conventions in Vegas, etc. But then, I got tired of lugging around equipment. I found that a good compact camera that lets you have some control over the settings was much more pleasurable to use and I took the easy and lighter route. So now I have a nice little camera, the Leica D-Lux 6, that if used properly, produces amazing results. It has a 1.4 aperture if anyone knows what that means.
I looked at those two close-ups above and saw blurred images (I didn't expect him to get that close in front of me or I would have set my lens to macro mode which would have put him in focus) and i cut off his head It's a good thing my hands were occupied! Lol. But the chopped off head shot does show his light chest hairs, which I, too, find incredibly sexy. He doesn't have enough to be a rug, but the little he has just oozes more (if possible) testosterone.
So I'm stuck in this hypercritical situation of the photos I take. If they are blurred, if the lighting is off, etc., I've always tossed them to the side. I don't like to show the bad stuff. But after reading your posts, to hell with my technical hang ups when it comes to Daniel. I'm happy if they make anyone here happy. I need to get over my perfectionism. I'm very hard on myself.
And yes, Bee, he was standing just a foot in front of me and talking. Pretty surreal. It doesn't last long though. I'll have to see about Saturday. You now have me motivated. .
I understand now why you impose such high standards on your self when you have a serious, ongoing interest in photography. I am just amazed that you had the presence of mind to take so many good photos in that situation.